How to make fructose in the liver, but you better not do it!
In one of my previous posts, I looked at the work of Richard Johnson, who claims that we have something like a fat switch in our body. While it is turned off, the body works normally and burns fat. If you inadvertently turn it on, you will store more fat and burn less. We also learned from him that the easiest way to turn it on is to quickly flood the liver with sugars dissolved in water, ie with the help of sweet drinks.
If we start to look in more detail at what process we will actually start, we will find this interesting enzymatic pathway (production line), which resides in liver cells and other organs that have glucose intake independent of insulin levels. This enzymatic pathway can convert glucose, generally considered a good and harmless sugar, into fructose, which according to research is considered to be one of the causes of metabolic problems such as obesity, diabetes, heart attack, etc. It is called the polyol pathway.
Quotation from Wikipedia (you can skip it, if you want):
The polyol pathway is a two-step process that converts glucose to fructose.[1] In this pathway glucose is reduced to sorbitol, which is subsequently oxidized to fructose. It is also called the sorbitol-aldose reductase pathway.
The pathway is implicated in diabetic complications, especially in microvascular damage to the retina,[2] kidney,[3] and nerves.[4]
Sorbitol cannot cross cell membranes, and, when it accumulates, it produces osmotic stresses on cells by drawing water into the insulin-independent tissues.[5]
The polyol enzymatic pathway, it consumes NADPH, will reduce your production of reduced glutathione (a cellular antioxidant).
Cells use glucose for energy. This normally occurs by phosphorylation from the enzyme hexokinase. However, if large amounts of glucose are present (as in diabetes mellitus), hexokinase becomes saturated and the excess glucose enters the polyol pathway when aldose reductase reduces it to sorbitol. This reaction oxidizes NADPH to NADP+. Sorbitol dehydrogenase can then oxidize sorbitol to fructose, which produces NADH from NAD+. Hexokinase can return the molecule to the glycolysis pathway by phosphorylating fructose to form fructose-6-phosphate. However, in uncontrolled diabetics that have high blood glucose - more than the glycolysis pathway can handle - the reactions mass balance ultimately favors the production of sorbitol.[6]
Activation of the polyol pathway results in a decrease of reduced NADPH and oxidized NAD+; these are necessary co-factors in redox reactions throughout the body, and under normal conditions they are not interchangeable. The decreased concentration of these NADPH leads to decreased synthesis of reduced glutathione, nitric oxide, myo-inositol, and taurine. Myo-inositol is particularly required for the normal function of nerves. Sorbitol may also glycate nitrogens on proteins, such as collagen, and the products of these glycations are referred-to as AGEs - advanced glycation end-products. AGEs are thought to cause disease in the human body, one effect of which is mediated by RAGE (receptor for advanced glycation end-products) and the ensuing inflammatory responses induced. They are seen in the hemoglobin A1C tests performed on known diabetics to assess their levels of glucose control.[6]
While most cells require the action of insulin for glucose to gain entry into the cell, the cells of the retina, kidney, and nervous tissues are insulin-independent, so glucose moves freely across the cell membrane, regardless of the action of insulin. The cells will use glucose for energy as normal, and any glucose not used for energy will enter the polyol pathway. When blood glucose is normal (about 100 mg/dl or 5.5 mmol/l), this interchange causes no problems, as aldose reductase has a low affinity for glucose at normal concentrations.
In a hyperglycemic state, the affinity of aldose reductase for glucose rises, causing much sorbitol to accumulate, and using much more NADPH, leaving less NADPH for other processes of cellular metabolism.[7] This change of affinity is what is meant by activation of the pathway. The amount of sorbitol that accumulates, however, may not be sufficient to cause osmotic influx of water.
NADPH acts to promote nitric oxide production and glutathione reduction, and its deficiency will cause glutathione deficiency. A glutathione deficiency, congenital or acquired, can lead to hemolysis caused by oxidative stress. Nitric oxide is one of the important vasodilators in blood vessels. Therefore, NADPH prevents reactive oxygen species from accumulating and damaging cells.[6]
End of quotation from Wikipedia.
Let's review important information:
- Activation of the polyol pathway deprives you of the main intracellular antioxidant (reduced glutathione, abbreviation GSH)
- It will reduce the production of nitric oxide, so your blood vessels will not be flexible enough and the risk of high blood pressure will increase.
- It will damage your thinnest blood vessels (capillaries) in your eyes and kidneys.
- It endangers normal nerve function.
- It causes protein glycation (something like roasting meat brown, but in your own body and more slowly).
So really nothing nice.
We will look for further context. I have stated in several previous posts that without reduced glutathione it is not possible to burn fats, they will be preferentially stored. By activating the polyol pathway, you also activate the production of fats from glucose, ie from common carbohydrates, from starch.
And now let's look at how this has to do with the issue of polyunsaturated vegetable oils. We will have to get bogged down in great detail, but don't worry, I will try to explain.
Obtaining cellular energy (ATP molecules) is a very complex process. There are basically only two sites where ATP arises from the ADP molecule. The first is in the cytoplasm without the presence of oxygen by the decomposition of glucose, fructose or galactose by so-called glycolysis, the second is in the mitochondrial enzyme complex V (five) which is the last electrical machine of the so-called electron transport chain, which processes electrons from NADH or FADH2.
Where do NADH or FADH2 molecules come from? They are a product of the so-called beta oxidation of fats or they can be a product of the Krebs (known also as TCA or citrate) cycle which is fed by intermediate products of decomposition of carbohydrates and fats. Fats do not allow to obtain ATP without the presence of oxygen, they do not have something like glycolysis in sugars.
And now for that context. Beta oxidation of fats is basically done by cutting off small pieces of a long chain fatty acid. This cutting of the two-carbon pieces takes place enzymatically, ie on micromachines specialized in this operation. But we already know that fats can have none, one, two or more unsaturated bonds in the chain, so it is necessary to have more options for trimming, more specialized enzymes. Different enzymes need different so-called cofactors to perform their function,
And here we come to the heart of the matter. While beta oxidation of saturated and monounsaturated fatty acids does not consume NADPH molecules, beta oxidation of polyunsaturated fats (vegetable oils from seeds) consumes NADPH. The fact that this causes a lack of reduced glutathione GSH is already known from other studies, it only confirms the validity of the hypothesis that the burning of polyunsaturated fatty acids in mitochondria or peroxizomes at least contributes to the epidemic of diseases of civilization. At the same time, NAD+ molecules are also consumed and NADH molecules are formed, but fewer FADH2 molecules are formed than in saturated fats, which can also have consequences. There is an excess of substrate for the production of ATP, but there is not enough signaling, there is not enough glutathione, this blocks the electron transport chain at the very beginning, on the first mitochondrial complex. And the second mitochondrial complex, which processes only FADH2 molecules, will also not work very well because not much FADH2 molecules is produced from polyunsaturated fats.
Returning to the polyol enzymatic pathway, it also consumes NADPH molecules, so it causes a deficiency of reduced glutathione (GSH), this slows down the consumption of NADH and causes a deficiency of NAD+ molecules. The basic energy mechanisms of the cell, such as the Krebs cycle and the electron transport chain slow down or stop. Take a look to the numbered paragraph above. These are the problems caused by NADPH deficiency and NAD+ deficiency. Think about what the combination of both processes, burning polyunsaturated vegetable oils and consuming sweet drinks will do with the cell. It cannot end differently than problems and illnesses. And again, alcoholic beverages behave very similarly in metabolism, especially at higher doses. The combination of vegetable oils from seeds with sugars and sweet or alcoholic beverages will reliably destroy your liver and cause many other health problems.
I would like to add one more hypothesis. Maybe Richard Johnson and the other proponents of the theory of the dangers of fructose are slightly wrong. The problem is probably not fructose itself, nor glucose or carbohydrates. The very process of activating the polyol pathway can be a problem. Although it is activated by sugars, with a normal healthy diet, when the concentration of sugars sent to the liver does not exceed safe levels and when there is no dangerous reduction in NADPH or glutathione levels, sugars and carbohydrates do not cause any problems. However, these safe levels are likely to be greatly reduced by excessive consumption of polyunsaturated fats. This is because these processes compete for the same molecules, namely NADPH, and both processes simultaneously can cause its deficiency.
References:
The phosphate makes a difference: Cellular functions of NADP
Alcohol metabolism - Microsomal (Cytochrome P450) Oxidation of Ethanol
Hi, you may find the heavy user alcohol pathway MEOS interesting.
ReplyDeletehttps://themedicalbiochemistrypage.org/ethanol-alcohol-metabolism-acute-and-chronic-toxicities/
I ran into this when searching for 4-HNE and this was the only hit! Takes a bit of credibility away from this exhaustive pages.
Anyway, cyp405 poison process is involved in both pufa6 and excess alcohol clearing. And gsh.
This would explain nicely why some people with heavy drinking get liver failure and some do not. It is a two front attack, pufa6 and alcohol consumption, using up the same resorces.
JR
Hi,
ReplyDeleteWhats your opinion on the bioenergetic view to fructose... basically that rick johnsons roddent research doesnt apply to humans?
Hi, I see that rodents are much more sensitive to auto-oxidation products of PUFA. This could shift mouse studies more to hypoxic environment and this leads to higher sensitivity to fructose. See this post https://mct4health.blogspot.com/2023/02/sugar-prolongs-life-of-cells-in.html
DeleteBut this is valid also for human, the only difference is that auto-oxidation of adipose PUFAs need some time.
One more idea, often they use 6J mouse without mentioning, for sugar studies, they have NNT knocked down, so I think this is like omega-6 loading without PUFA feeding.
DeleteOk but at least the latter makes it very different...
DeleteUsually the argument also goes, that they feed pure fructose which is not absorbed, feeding bacteria causing LPS production which leads to the effect and poisioning of the liver. Pure fructose is of course not natural, and in fruit or sugar the ratio of glucose:fructose is generally 1:1 which is optimal.
Secondly, the amount they give is equivalent of multiple (like around 30) cans of soda I think to remember. Which again has nothing to do with reality.
Thirdly, the capacity of the liver to process the fructose is different.
Humans have a liver designed to support a huge hungry brain whereas rodents dont. This has an impact on glycogen storage capacity, DNL and on and on.
So what are the reasons that make you think fruit, juices etc are to any extend problematic for humans?
May be my point wasn't so clear, I don't think that sugar or fructose is itself poisonous. But in combination with our PUFA environment it is. You should switch to really low fat <10% of calories from fat, like Kempner rice/sugar/juice diet, to be sure it is safe. But it would be very restrictive.
DeleteAnd what is it about the PUFA - fructose connection thats so particularly problematic that differs from the PUFA - glucose / starch connection?
DeleteHypoxia, carbohydrates cannot be processed effectively with fats, that in the form of FFA cause PDH complex to be suppressed. Unsaturated fats do it more than saturated, but PUFA omega-6 does it the most. Hypoxia is caused by suppressing TCA cycle production of CO2. All I explain on this blog with references, eg here https://mct4health.blogspot.com/2023/06/stop-co2-producing-enzymes-in-fat-cell.html
DeleteThank you for the input. So at what step here does it matter whether its fructose or glucose?
DeleteThe simplest explanation is that fructose redirect glucose from oxidation to CO2 to be converted to lactate instead. This blocs carbohydrate and fat.metabolism to CO2 and elevate storage and new synthesys of fat. See https://mct4health.blogspot.com/2023/02/sugar-prolongs-life-of-cells-in.html
DeleteBy the way, flavonols in fruit or honey may partially protect against hypoxia inducible factor activation..See https://mct4health.blogspot.com/2022/12/onion-chocolate-tea-or-wine-flavonols.html
DeleteThis sounds like reductive stress.
DeleteI still dont get the why though ...
Why/how does "fructose redirect glucose from oxidation to CO2 to be converted to lactate"?
"Interestingly, fructose is hardly metabolized. It enters the cell via the GLUT5 transporter and is converted to F1P. This causes suppression of the function of one important enzyme, pyruvate kinase (PKM2). But it only shows up in mild hypoxia. If there's enough oxygen, nothing special happens. It is only when oxygen deprivation creates the conditions for fructose to suppress PKM2 through excess F1P and thereby over-activate the transcription factor HIF-1, a change in the expression of many genes related to survival in oxygen deprivation. This is likely related to reduced H2O2 production when PKM2 activity is suppressed."
DeleteIt's my description of findings from here https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03827-2
DeleteThank you!
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete